eFax vs FaxTerra
eFax pioneered online faxing but hasn't kept up on pricing. At $16.95/mo for 150 pages it's nearly 70% more expensive than FaxTerra's $9.99 Business plan (200 pages), and FaxTerra has a free tier where eFax doesn't.
Last updated: May 2026
Pricing Comparison
FaxTerra
10 pages/month
50 pages/mo
Includes dedicated fax number
eFax
150s + 150r
Includes fax number
200s + 200r
Includes fax number
Feature Comparison
| Feature | FaxTerra | eFax |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ||
| No branding | ||
| Dedicated number | ||
| Fax inbox | ||
| Send + receive | ||
| Cover page | ||
| PDF preview | ||
| Email notifications | ||
| No contract | ||
| Transparent overage pricing |
eFax — Pros & Cons
What they do well
- Well-known, established brand
- Available in many countries
- Mobile apps for iOS and Android
Where FaxTerra wins
- Very expensive — starts at $16.95/mo
- Only 150 pages for that price
- Expensive overage at $0.10-$0.15/page
- Free tier is receive-only (10 pages)
The Verdict
eFax pioneered online faxing but hasn't kept up on pricing. At $16.95/mo for 150 pages, it's nearly 70% more expensive than FaxTerra's Business plan ($9.99/mo for 200 pages). FaxTerra also has a real free tier for sending.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is eFax so expensive?
eFax relies on brand recognition and enterprise contracts. FaxTerra offers comparable features starting at $4.99/mo — a fraction of eFax's $16.95/mo.
Does eFax have a free plan?
eFax offers 10 free received pages per month but no free sending. FaxTerra gives you 10 free pages per month.
How much can I save switching from eFax?
Switching from eFax Plus ($16.95/mo) to FaxTerra Business ($9.99/mo) saves you $83.52/year while getting more included pages (200 vs 150).
Is eFax better than FaxTerra?
eFax has broader international coverage and mobile apps. For US-based faxing, FaxTerra offers the same core features at a much lower price with a better free tier.
- “They sent the fax absolutely free. Kudos!” — Dan
- “Easy and quick and simple” — Manda
- “Quick, easy, responsive” — David